Have something to say?

Tell us how we could make the product more useful to you.

Acknowledge purposely missing well known models

As you know, there is a race to add new models as soon as possible after they come out. In the case of Claude Sonnet 4, for example, you’ve added it literally hours after it was released. If you don’t do it, competitors will. Still, I understand some models (like o4-mini and o3) are missing due to a business decision to charge usage-based pricing for them, which requires further development. My request is that if a well known model is out, and there’s a business decision not to add it, still do add it to the list and just gray it out with an asterisk. Then write a a comment like: * Reserved for future usage-based billing: This will give transparency and avoid unwarranted feature requests. The ideal form is to have a major company announcing a new version: Then hours later already add it to beat any competition: But if it’s purposely not added then just acknowledge it, like in the following:

lwc 21 days ago

💡 Feature Request