Support Pasting Images/Files from System Clipboard into Browser
Enable users to paste images or files directly from their system clipboard into the browser interface—similar to the experience in the vanilla OpenAI UI.
Aditya Karki 11 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Support Pasting Images/Files from System Clipboard into Browser
Enable users to paste images or files directly from their system clipboard into the browser interface—similar to the experience in the vanilla OpenAI UI.
Aditya Karki 11 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Apps Used aren't linkedin in Users
The tagged Apps in https://pmfm.ai/users aren’t linked, please make sure they can be clicked to just generally go the relevant app’s dashboard.
lwc 17 days ago
🐛 Bugs
Apps Used aren't linkedin in Users
The tagged Apps in https://pmfm.ai/users aren’t linked, please make sure they can be clicked to just generally go the relevant app’s dashboard.
lwc 17 days ago
🐛 Bugs
Acknowledge purposely missing well known models
As you know, there is a race to add new models as soon as possible after they come out. In the case of Claude Sonnet 4, for example, you’ve added it literally hours after it was released. If you don’t do it, competitors will. Still, I understand some models (like o4-mini and o3) are missing due to a business decision to charge usage-based pricing for them, which requires further development. My request is that if a well known model is out, and there’s a business decision not to add it, still do add it to the list and just gray it out with an asterisk. Then write a a comment like: * Reserved for future usage-based billing: This will give transparency and avoid unwarranted feature requests. The ideal form is to have a major company announcing a new version: Then hours later already add it to beat any competition: But if it’s purposely not added then just acknowledge it, like in the following:
lwc 21 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Acknowledge purposely missing well known models
As you know, there is a race to add new models as soon as possible after they come out. In the case of Claude Sonnet 4, for example, you’ve added it literally hours after it was released. If you don’t do it, competitors will. Still, I understand some models (like o4-mini and o3) are missing due to a business decision to charge usage-based pricing for them, which requires further development. My request is that if a well known model is out, and there’s a business decision not to add it, still do add it to the list and just gray it out with an asterisk. Then write a a comment like: * Reserved for future usage-based billing: This will give transparency and avoid unwarranted feature requests. The ideal form is to have a major company announcing a new version: Then hours later already add it to beat any competition: But if it’s purposely not added then just acknowledge it, like in the following:
lwc 21 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Claude Sonnet v4 is written in a different format than other Claude versions
For Claude, the AI Model selection usually uses: Claude [Version] [Name] ([Company]) Except for the new v4: Claude [Name] [Version] ([Company]) For consistency please consider keeping the same structure. It will fit in better, and will reduce the chance of users missing it out.
lwc 21 days ago
🐛 Bugs
Claude Sonnet v4 is written in a different format than other Claude versions
For Claude, the AI Model selection usually uses: Claude [Version] [Name] ([Company]) Except for the new v4: Claude [Name] [Version] ([Company]) For consistency please consider keeping the same structure. It will fit in better, and will reduce the chance of users missing it out.
lwc 21 days ago
🐛 Bugs
Apps shouldn't hide features when being logged out
When you’re logged off, apps’ design misses many elements Feedback button, Starting questions Microphone button Request Support link The design is just much less nicer It became more noticeable since the newly designed dashboard links to https://[id].pmfm.ai instead of https://pmfm.ai/[id] and the former is a another subdomain, thus logged out by default. The point one’s app is one’s selling point, so why hide features (like microphone)?
lwc About 1 month ago
🐛 Bugs
Apps shouldn't hide features when being logged out
When you’re logged off, apps’ design misses many elements Feedback button, Starting questions Microphone button Request Support link The design is just much less nicer It became more noticeable since the newly designed dashboard links to https://[id].pmfm.ai instead of https://pmfm.ai/[id] and the former is a another subdomain, thus logged out by default. The point one’s app is one’s selling point, so why hide features (like microphone)?
lwc About 1 month ago
🐛 Bugs
When NOT using "Turn off File Uploads" it seems to support only specific models
When choosing for example o3 the file upload symbol simply doesn’t exist even if you did NOT turn it off. So this option should either support all models or just like Turn on File Generation it should end with a remark like, (GPT models*).
lwc About 1 month ago
🐛 Bugs
When NOT using "Turn off File Uploads" it seems to support only specific models
When choosing for example o3 the file upload symbol simply doesn’t exist even if you did NOT turn it off. So this option should either support all models or just like Turn on File Generation it should end with a remark like, (GPT models*).
lwc About 1 month ago
🐛 Bugs
Monetize apps through ads
Last week, Google Ads started testing monetizing chatbots. Maybe you should approach Google to be among the first, as this could allow an alternate stream of revenue and reduce your pricing packages to app owners that opt-in.
lwc About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Monetize apps through ads
Last week, Google Ads started testing monetizing chatbots. Maybe you should approach Google to be among the first, as this could allow an alternate stream of revenue and reduce your pricing packages to app owners that opt-in.
lwc About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Annual Subscription Billing
Add an option to the subscription billing to be monthly or annual. So could offer the product at $10/mo or save 50% and pay $60/yr.
Tyler Calvert About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Annual Subscription Billing
Add an option to the subscription billing to be monthly or annual. So could offer the product at $10/mo or save 50% and pay $60/yr.
Tyler Calvert About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Add OpenAI o4-mini and o3
While OpenAI’s full o4 isn’t out yet, o4-mini as well as the full o3 were released together half a month ago, so please add both of which. They’re supposed to be some of the best, so time is an important factor here.
lwc About 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Add OpenAI o4-mini and o3
While OpenAI’s full o4 isn’t out yet, o4-mini as well as the full o3 were released together half a month ago, so please add both of which. They’re supposed to be some of the best, so time is an important factor here.
lwc About 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Completed
Welcome to Pro has a dead link
The e-mail once gets upon subscribing includes the following part: 5. Access Codes - you can restrict access to your apps with an access code. For example, try out my Emojify app here But it can’t be tried out since the word here has a broken link, i.e. no such chatbot emojify.
lwc About 2 months ago
🐛 Bugs
Completed
Welcome to Pro has a dead link
The e-mail once gets upon subscribing includes the following part: 5. Access Codes - you can restrict access to your apps with an access code. For example, try out my Emojify app here But it can’t be tried out since the word here has a broken link, i.e. no such chatbot emojify.
lwc About 2 months ago
🐛 Bugs
Add full transparency about Pro/Lite/Free analytics page
Currently this page statically states Last 100 Users and Last 100 Prompts even though only Pro Plus and above actually supports it. Free and Lite support only 1, while Pro supports only 50. That’s okay, but I just think it should be clearly shown there.
lwc 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Add full transparency about Pro/Lite/Free analytics page
Currently this page statically states Last 100 Users and Last 100 Prompts even though only Pro Plus and above actually supports it. Free and Lite support only 1, while Pro supports only 50. That’s okay, but I just think it should be clearly shown there.
lwc 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Make API access part of the user business model
If you want to embed your bot via API, basically it means even if users actually pay you via Pmfm to use your bots, it doesn't touch their quota and use only yours. As result, this is what happens if you try to use API to connect to a bot that isn't yours: {"message": "Unauthorized: API key does not have permission for this app", "status": 403, "success": false} My request is that if you’re a user of bot, you should be able to access it via API too, especially if you pay that bot.
lwc 3 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Make API access part of the user business model
If you want to embed your bot via API, basically it means even if users actually pay you via Pmfm to use your bots, it doesn't touch their quota and use only yours. As result, this is what happens if you try to use API to connect to a bot that isn't yours: {"message": "Unauthorized: API key does not have permission for this app", "status": 403, "success": false} My request is that if you’re a user of bot, you should be able to access it via API too, especially if you pay that bot.
lwc 3 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Control over model parameters
I would improve the quality of my chat applications to have control over the model parameters, especially the temperature, but preferably all parameters.
nielsbogerd 3 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Control over model parameters
I would improve the quality of my chat applications to have control over the model parameters, especially the temperature, but preferably all parameters.
nielsbogerd 3 months ago
💡 Feature Request
option to use our own google search engine
have my own prepped engine that I want to incorporate into an app
Tobias Cabrera 4 months ago
💡 Feature Request
option to use our own google search engine
have my own prepped engine that I want to incorporate into an app
Tobias Cabrera 4 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Glitch re: being asked to login when user hasn't even used a free credit yet
Not sure how this happened, but someone I sent my app to had an issue. I believe she clicked on button 2 (which is a link to an external page explaining the app) and then, when she returned to the main app page, she couldn’t use the free messages I’ve allowed there. Here’s what she wrote: “I tried to use a free message – but when I clicked return it said I had to login with a username and password. I don’t have an account. Don’t know what I am supposed to put there.” This seems somewhat serious to me as it could turn someone off, leading them to click away from the app.
Lisa Egle 4 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Glitch re: being asked to login when user hasn't even used a free credit yet
Not sure how this happened, but someone I sent my app to had an issue. I believe she clicked on button 2 (which is a link to an external page explaining the app) and then, when she returned to the main app page, she couldn’t use the free messages I’ve allowed there. Here’s what she wrote: “I tried to use a free message – but when I clicked return it said I had to login with a username and password. I don’t have an account. Don’t know what I am supposed to put there.” This seems somewhat serious to me as it could turn someone off, leading them to click away from the app.
Lisa Egle 4 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Revert to previous version of prompt
Sometimes, I change my prompt a little and it suddenly doesn’t work. It’d be great to be able to revert to a previous version. For now, I’m saving the prompts that work as a ‘change log’ of sorts, but it can/does get confusing.
Lisa Egle 4 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Revert to previous version of prompt
Sometimes, I change my prompt a little and it suddenly doesn’t work. It’d be great to be able to revert to a previous version. For now, I’m saving the prompts that work as a ‘change log’ of sorts, but it can/does get confusing.
Lisa Egle 4 months ago
💡 Feature Request